Nancy Pelosi could be the first female president
I believe that Nancy Pelosi could be the first female president.
How?
I’ll start with some background information, first.
In the event that the president is removed from office (by death, impeachment, resignation, etc.), someone must fill the position. The Presidential Succession Act of 1947 outlines who becomes president if the president is so removed.
First in line is the vice president, which is currently Dick Cheney. Second is the speaker of the house, which is Nancy Pelosi. Third, fourth, and fifth are the president pro tempore of the senate (Robert Byrd), the secretary of state (Condi Rice), and the secretary of the treasury (Henry Paulsen, Jr.), respectively. If you’re interested in the rest of the line of succession, read the article about it.
So, if President Bush were removed from office, Vice President Cheney would become president and he’d pick his own vice president (most likely not Nancy Pelosi since she’s a democrat and he’s a republican). If Cheney was removed from his office before he could make the appointment, or his appointed person was removed along with Cheney, the speaker of the house would become president. Thus, Speaker Nancy Pelosi becomes the first female president.
So how does the United States go about removing President Bush and VP Cheney nearly simultaneously?
Impeachment.
Former Rep. Cynthia McKinney filed articles of impeachment, which you should have read if you really want to understand the rest of my post, on 27 December 2006, the last day the 109th Congress was in session. This means that the articles are on file in the congressional record, but are not able to be voted on by the 110th Congress.
Fmr. Rep. McKinney charged in her articles of impeachment not only President Bush, but VP Cheney and Sec. of State Rice and others. The likelihood of impeaching all of them together is very slim, as the charges aren’t as clear against Cheney et alia. However, if all impeachment efforts are focused on President Bush, it’s very, very likely that Cheney et al. will be implicated and eventually charged with like crimes as the impeachment trial against President Bush progresses.
However, Pelosi, then-minority leader of the house, said in a 60 Minutes interview that impeachment was "off the table" and that it wouldn’t be considered by the new House. She told this to her caucus in May.
So, following typical House dynamics, in which members of the speaker’s party do what the speaker says, no democrat will initiate impeachment proceedings. Of course, no republican will attempt to impeach a republican president.
So how can impeachment still happen?
There’s a little-known and rarely-used clause in Jefferson’s Manual, a guide to parliamentary procedure found in the Rules of the House of Representatives, which states that any citizen can initiate the impeachment proceedings. Now, this initiation still must go to the House, but the fact that a regular citizen can do this is pretty amazing.
This section reads:
In the House of Representatives there are various methods of setting an impeachment in motion: by charges made on the floor on the responsibility of a Member or Delegate (II, 1303; III, 2342, 2400, 2469; VI, 525, 526, 528, 535, 536); by charges preferred by a memorial, which is usually referred to a committee for examination (III, 2364, 2491, 2494, 2496, 2499, 2515; VI, 552); or by a resolution dropped in the hopper by a Member and referred to a committee (April 15, 1970, p. 11941-2); by a message from the President (III, 2294, 2319; VI, 498); by charges transmitted from the legislature of a State (III, 2469) or Territory (III, 2487) or from a grand jury (III, 2488); or from facts developed and reported by an investigating committee of the House (III, 2399, 2444).
The key part of this clause this the phrase "by charges preferred by a memorial, which is usually referred to a committee for examination," which essentially translates from legalese to "by charges brought against an elected official by a petition and accompanying statement of facts to be examined by a committee."
There are lot of efforts convince Congress to impeach President Bush, but this particular method was brought to my attention by Jodin Morey of Impeach for Peace. I find it fascinating and effective—in the 1820s, a St. Louis lawyer initiated impeachment proceedings against a federal court judge, who was later acquitted.
I’m not going to say that this is the best method, or that "it’s going to work", but I will say that it is certainly a broad avenue on which the masses can march.
I digress.
I believe that there will not be a female president until there has been a female vice president, unless there is a woman in the line of succession and all of the people before her are removed.
Geraldine Ferraro was the first woman in modern times to come close to being in a position to be president by being a candidate for vice president, but then she and 1984 presidential candidate Walter Mondale were defeated in a landslide victory by Ronald Reagan.
Winona LaDuke was also in the vice presidential position as Ralph Nader’s Green Party running make in the 2000 elections, but only received 2.7% of the popular vote.
Nancy Pelosi is in the perfect position to become president: the president could take a fall, and his vice president could fall with him. With that, Pelosi becomes president, the United States of America gets its first female president, and the democrats have a two-term introduction to the next at least four years of presidential power.


Matt McClelland:
Colin, I’ve heard some big ones in my day, but this is by far the worst. The first problem with your theory is that the President would have to commit an impeachable offense. Last I heard, being a moron that claims to talk to God wasn’t an impeachable offense. Nor is leading our country to an unjust war. The sad fact is that if President Clinton wasn’t removed from office after he clearly committed perjury in a court of law, then a slim democratic majority also doesn’t have a Ben Mentzer’s chance in the helpdesk of removing Bush from office. That slim majority also blows up your assertion that Pelosi would rise to the Presidency even if tweedle dee and tweedle dumb somehow got removed from office at the same time. There would be no chance in hell that a far left liberal would be confirmed to the Presidency…much less a far left woman. If both a President and a Vice President were somehow taken out of play in this society, the divisive nature of our government today would lead to political chaos, and i think it would take weeks for someone to be confirmed. The one excellent point you make is that there will need to be a woman VP before there is any chance of a woman as President. Not only would a woman face problems here at home, but there are countries who would simply not deal with a female leader of the free world.
11 January 2007, 4:29 pmColin Dean:
Did you read the articles of impeachment proposed by Fmr. Rep. McKinney? That document lists the allegations against him and, in purpose, calls for Congress to determine if the allegations are impeachable.
The thing about the line of succession is that it’s set-in-stone. Pelosi doesn’t need to be confirmed! If Bush and Cheney are out, she’s in. That is, unless she says she doesn’t want it. Then Byrd gets it.
I won’t lie—it’s probably not going to happen, but if it does, Pelosi is president.
11 January 2007, 4:47 pmBryan Peck:
Good lord, I didn’t read the article because my eyes won’t focus. I do have to say that “Ben Mentzer’s chance in the helpdesk” made me almost fall of my chair from pure, unadulterated mirth.
That is all.
11 January 2007, 11:23 pmJean Cochran:
That’s seriously my greatest fear, that someone will take Bush out and we’ll be stuck with a far-left liberal whack job like Pelosi, who will probably a. pull us out of the war and throw Iraq into mayhem and b. get less than NO respect from the leaders of muslim nations. the fact is, though the United States may be ready to follow the leadership of a female, the countries that pose a biggest threat to us will not submit to a female being in power, and our conflicts with them will likely escalate.
Also, you’re ignoring the point that BUSH DID NOTHING IMPEACHABLE. Impeachment is a serious process, they’re not going to just lightly throw it around for the fun of it.
12 January 2007, 6:17 amColin Dean:
A purpose of articles of impeachment is to seek impeachment by determining if the charges are impeachable. An elected official doesn’t have to commit a hard crime to be impeached. The lawyer I mentioned when after the federal court judge on a charge of “abuse of the contempt power.” Abuse of power is probably what impeachers would seek, should the articles ever be brought to the House again.
Benazir Bhutto was the first female prime minister of a Muslim state (Pakistan). There have been no female presidents of a Muslim state yet.
12 January 2007, 10:15 amBen Mentzer:
Damnit McClelland. I don’t want anything to do with this crazy-talk! All I know is that there are enough closet-sexist men that having a female president will be next to impossible. Unless more men are born with vaginas (see David Dean), then it ain’t happenin’.
13 January 2007, 8:13 pmBen Mentzer:
Oh, and impeaching both the president and vice president at the same time? Not gonna happen with our legal system…the proceedings would probably take so long that their time in office would be over before anything is really done, so no crazy Nancy Pelosi’s taking over.
13 January 2007, 8:14 pm